| |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
A Gender Perspective and the Swedish Employment Protection Act
|
|
Sammanfattning
The analysis of flexicurity and SEPA shows that women differ from the notion of the typical employee upon which the norms of both flexicurity and SEPA are based. This means that men, in general, have better chances of achieving job and employment security both under SEPA and flexicurity. Neither the regulations in SEPA nor the norms on which flexicurity is based have considered the conditions specific to women. Both when the labour market is regulated on the basis of stability in the employment relationship between employer and employee, and when this relationship is characterised by flexibility, women are excluded. The major problem is the lack of gender analysis in the approach that forms the foundation for SEPA and flexicurity. |
Läs hela artikeln
A Gender Perspective and the Swedish Employment Protection Act |
|
Texten har även publicerats i:
Feminist@Law |
|
|
|
|
|